Find another way in
Suggest a different opening question that connects this learning goal to something learners already know.
Berkeley International SchoolBangkok, Thailand
Your next task: checking claims about drinking-water use. Bring your class and programme context to PLAI™, then shape the draft around what you want learners to understand.
AI-generated campus illustration. Not a photograph of this school.
Berkeley International School links inquisitive thinking with ethical citizenship and contribution. Use that approach to ask learners to inspect claims about drinking-water use before forming a conclusion, noting what the evidence supports and what remains uncertain.
What do you know about Berkeley International School and its curriculum?
School context
Help learners evaluate a source and explain what remains uncertain. Build towards that goal with a question, an activity and a chance to explain their thinking.
Help me plan an activity for lower secondary learners about checking claims about drinking-water use. First ask for my year group, programme, objective and permitted materials. Include an opening question, a shared activity and an independent check. Help learners evaluate a source and explain what remains uncertain. Do not invent school assessment criteria or lesson sequences.
Inspect the two fictional notices. Identify who produced them, when they were produced and which claims need a further check. For this page’s task, prepare the material around checking claims about drinking-water use.
Help me prepare an original task about checking claims about drinking-water use for my confirmed class. I will supply the source content. Use Check the source before sharing a claim as a model for the teaching structure. Ask for my year group, goal and prior learning. Check the new subject content and age suitability, offer optional support and leave an independent explanation. Keep source facts distinct from this new task and do not infer school criteria.
Review the new checking claims about drinking-water use task for my confirmed class. Check the subject content, reading load and response space. Add optional support while keeping an independent explanation. Apply the same checks to the actual accounts or sources for the class topic. Distinguish a stated fact, an inference and missing evidence.
Use the source as a teaching model, then review the new task for your confirmed class.
For checking claims about drinking-water use, decide what pupils must explain independently. Apply the same checks to the actual accounts or sources for the class topic. Distinguish a stated fact, an inference and missing evidence.
Keep the conversation going
Tell PLAI™ what you want to change. Try one of these follow-ups with your draft, then check the result for your class.
Suggest a different opening question that connects this learning goal to something learners already know.
Add an optional vocabulary box and a sentence starter. Keep the main reasoning task and final independent question.
Add a follow-up question that asks learners to explain their reasoning in a new situation.
Start with checking claims about drinking-water use, or bring a topic of your own. Keep your learning objective and professional judgement at the centre.
Start with PLAI™