Second in Science and Key Stage 4 Science Lead

Marek Sobczak

I choose Science practice tied to an exact specification point, making the assessed knowledge or method visible and keeping pathway decisions open to evidence and review.

Explore the collection

A little about me

At Key Stage 4, the choice between separate and combined science is a significant planning decision. I lead that provision as Second in Science, and I want the evidence behind each route to be visible rather than reducing the discussion to a default.

Past-paper questions are most useful to me when they are tied to an exact specification point. A broad topic label can hide the detail a pupil needs to practise, so I look for material that identifies the particular knowledge or method being assessed. That precision also helps teachers discuss what has and has not been covered.

Families may ask how a pathway decision was reached. I want the school to be able to explain the reasoning with evidence and the relevant course requirements. Planning should stay open to review as evidence develops, rather than being treated as settled before the decision has been properly discussed.

How I approach a lesson

  1. Link practice questions to the exact specification point they assess.

  2. Keep the reasoning for combined or separate science pathways visible.

  3. Revisit the pathway reasoning when new evidence becomes available.

Templates I'd use with my class

Explore these templates and decide what fits your own setting.

Resource preview